Multisite: A Strategy or A Solution

Churches of all shapes and sizes are searching for ways to maximize the impact of their ministry and how to most effectively spread the Gospel.  From the downtowns of our largest cities, to the suburbs, church plants occupy schools, hotels, theaters, and shopping centers.  Every church is faced with the need to have facilities that meet the needs of their ministry to minister effectively.  Whether it is sanctuary seating or having sufficient classrooms for toddlers and children, the church faces questions about how to be most effective as they seek to reach people.
At the core of the evangelical church, is the desire to reach as many people as possible with the saving message of the Gospel.  A megachurch and a local community church must both face the same question: Does the facility allow the church to accomplish its ministry effectively?  A small church building that seats 200 people may have great preaching and programs, but if there are not sufficient facilities to meet the needs of the ministry, then growth will stop and people will search for another church which provides better programs.  Likewise a mega-church that builds a 5,000 seat sanctuary must make sure that the education space that is built is strong enough to support the seating capacity.  It is imperative that Church leaders consider how their facilities affect the ministry.
As churches evaluate their facility issues the options of expanding, relocating and multisite are options that are considered.  In a survey of the largest 100 churches in America, there are more multisite churches than there are megachurches.  In this survey, conducted by Ed Stetzer and Lifeway Research, 75% of the 100 Largest Churches in America are using Multisite and 59% of the 100 Fastest Growing Churches in America have more than 1 location.  When church leaders meet to discuss the mission and vision of the church, multisite is a hot topic as a strategy to reach people in different locations.  So the question presents itself:  Is multisite a strategy or a solution?

A Strategy
At the inception of starting a church, it is important to understand the mission and vision of the church.  Many church planters start their church based on a call from the Lord and start with a small amount of resources and the prayers of the people or church that sends them.  Today, traditional church plants have a failure rate of close to 50%.  Despite great church planting organizations like Acts29, church planters face an uphill battle.  Church planters work hard to plant a church on limited funds, in rented facilities and with minimal staffing.  Often a young Pastor and his young family enter a new environment with limited organizational or financial help from a sponsoring church.  On the other hand these great church planters go out into their personal “Jerusalem” and get plugged into a community and build relationships that help build the foundation for the new work, the church plant.  Church planting is key to the great commission, yet many are starting to question is there a better way to avoid seeing 50% of church plants fail and see a Pastor burnout.

Traditionally growing churches have started church plants as the church seeks to Biblically spread the Gospel and start new works in new locations.  The model of a church sending out a Pastor with their prayer, blessing, and some form of financial support is changing.  Today many strong churches are exploring multisite to begin new “church plants” in new cities, states and even around the world.  Multisite has become an option that allows churches to plant new starts with strong leadership, financial strength and better resources.  As churches explore multisite they come to realize that multisite allows the church to be a better steward of resources.  Mike Buster, Executive Pastor at Prestonwood Baptist Church in Plano, Texas, called the move to multisite “an issue of stewardship”.  As the Plano Campus grew and members were being added from cities 25 minutes away the leadership found that many were driving a great distance to church but that those people were not as likely to bring their neighbors with them.  The first multisite came as a result of seeing a large number of members in the “380 Corridor” which was a strong growth area.  The “North Campus” would enable these members to reach their neighbors in their own community.   The addition of the first multisite for Prestonwood, allowed the church to “leverage their resources” and to be a better steward of those resources to reach people for Christ.  The decision to start multisite falls in line with the mission statement of the church and Buster indicated that pursuing the multisite model must line up with the mission of the church.  
There is a great need in the church today for the church to be “in the community”.  The trend of home groups and multisite both point to the need that the church must be local in its ministry.  Multisite can be a successful strategy to reach people by activating each member to be more fully engaged in their fellowship.  I have heard many Pastors’ talk about the members that are willing to drive long distances to the church they love but they struggle to bring the people they live with to church.  The strategy of multisite allows members to be ministers and actively engage their community and reach people for Christ.

A Solution
A church committee is considering expansion plans and determines that the budget is not workable.  More churches are starting to consider the option of buying an existing building that is affordable and operating it as a multisite.  Many churches start their first multisite as a way to solve a facility issue.  LifeChurch.tv started their first multisite in a theater as they had reached capacity in their six services at their church campus.  The church could not afford to build as it would cost too much and take too much time.  This is a real situation for churches of all sizes.  If a church has already reached capacity and wants to start considering a building program it will be necessary to count the actual cost to build the facilities but to also count the cost in terms of ministry space and the ability to sustain membership in an already maxed out facility.
  Kevin Penry, Operations Leader at LifeChurch.tv said the first multisite definitely came as a solution to a need to provide space for more people.  Similarly, The Village Church in Flower Mound, Texas realized that they had reached capacity at their campus.  Brian Miller, Lead Pastor of Ministry Services, said they had reached capacity in multiple services and were praying through their next steps to address the issue.  In discussing the steps that led to multisite Miller said, “We did everything we could with our building; multisite was not a part of a plan, but rather the provision of God provided through a church about 30 minutes away that approached the Village about a merger”.   This enabled members that drove from a great distance, to shorten their drive and become active members.  Miller stated that multisite has not been a strategy, it has been taking the ministry to the members allowing them to be intentional within the communities where they live.
Other smaller churches have started their churches with the multisite model at a very early stage.  A church that is less than 200 members, leasing in a shopping center that is considering a multisite as a solution, would be wise to count the cost and talk to others that have done multisite before fully pursuing multisite.  Kevin Penry, commented that “if you can do church where you are and don’t need to do multisite don’t do it”.  The wisdom in this statement is as follows:  1) Multisite is not a fad that everyone needs to try 2) Multisite is a tool of the mission not THE mission 3) If it is worth doing do it well and then replicate.  The decision to start a multisite as a solution must be made by a strong home church that is solid in membership, grounded in its mission and vision, and financially secure.

Conclusion  
While many churches embark on the multisite experience as a solution to a facility problem, the repeated theme I have heard from each of them is that Multisite is about Discipleship.  Multisite is about mobilizing members to be more active in their community and focused on mission to bring their friends and neighbors to church.  “Multisite is a strategy for growth based on discipleship” says Brian Miller from The Village Church.
As I work with churches that are considering facility decisions, I hear the discussions to expand, relocate, and/or start a multisite.  Multisite can be an effective solution for a church that has reached capacity.  The churches in this article that used it as a solution had more than 2,000 in weekend attendance before embarking on the multisite road.  While it started for them as a solution it quickly became a strategy that allowed the church to reach more people and it empowered the members to be more involved.  If your church is considering multisite, please take a moment to count the cost, consider your mission, and begin to take the steps to be the best steward of your resources as you use them for ministry.

Will my child follow my example before he follows me on Twitter?

Thanks to a tweet from @mattchandler74 I decided to follow his lead and take a social media sabbatical during Holy Week.  Not only was it a good break but I had noticed recently that my left hand would twitch quite often.  This made me think I might be holding my phone a little too much. Add that to the times recently when my 7 year old has asked, "are you done with your phone yet", I realized maybe I need a break.

It is remarkable how much time we spend on our phones.  The majority of that time is not on the phone talking to a human but checking our email, Twitter, Facebook, and the Internet.  These things in and of themselves are not bad but as we look further into how much time we spend looking at these things we start to see where our priorities are.  I don't have scientific research and reports here to share. Please allow me to share a few of my personal experiences and think about your personal use.  I hope this is helpful for us all.

My phone allows my work to consume me.
If I do not INTENTIONALLY put the phone down and away when I walk in the door from a day of work then I never actually arrive home fully to my family.  I realized that when I walk in the door and continue to check email and answer phone calls it feels like I am still at work to my family.  While my work may be important it should not take priority over my time with my wife and my son.  They need me to BE HOME when I get home.  Putting the phone down is difficult for all of us.  We like to feel needed and checking our phone makes us feel good.  We are constantly checking our email to make sure we are on top of things or up on the latest report at work.  However, we must remember that we are Husband and Dad to our families and when we are with our family work can wait.  This is extremely difficult for a lot of people but we must be laser focused on our priorities and INTENTIONALLY set aside our time with our families so that our work does not define and control us.

Twitter feeds my ego.
I am a Twitter addict.  Who here can testify?  Like a smoker or an alcoholic needs that smoke or tat drink many of us go looking for the latest update or notification to see who followed us, retweeted our last pithy tweet or favorited our blog post.  Taking a week away from Twitter really made me feel like I was in the dark.  I did not miss Facebook but there were times I found myself yearning for a twitter fix.  What's the latest news, score, blog post?  I use Twitter for work purposes as well and I almost rationalized to myself that I needed to get on to see what was happening.  However, taking a week away did allow me to spend more time reflecting on Holy Week and it kept my mind focused during a short work week.  I did feel like I had less clutter in my brain and that was a good thing.  Twitter has alot of good content and depending on who you follow it can be a great resource.  But if you follow the wrong people it can just become an endless gossip column and waste of time.  After this sabbatical I realized that I can use Twitter better by focusing my time and reducing the number of times I check Twitter.  I will be Strategic and Intentional with Twitter.  For me that means not checking it constantly and maybe weeding out some of the Twitterers that do not contribute to my experience on Twitter.

Our children are being raised in a different world.  The world of social media is constantly changing how we communicate.  I pray that we as parents and more importantly as Christians do not allow the social media world to raise our kids but that we will Intentionally raise our children showing them the right priorities and be an example for them to follow.  I hope they follow our example before they follow us on Twitter.

Ministry to the Pastoral Team

While the church reaches out to members and the un-churched that are hurting there is a group that is often overlooked.  Sadly, the Pastoral leadership, is often isolated and lives in a place with few trusted friends.  This can lead to depression and lives that can be torn apart by sin.  Last, I checked Pastors are sinners just like you and me.  The difference between the Pastor and the regular Joe is that Pastor's have a target on their back from Satan unlike what a church member might have.  Satan wants to take down a strong leader of many Christians because he knows that by taking down a Pastor that leads a flock he can take down more than one man.  We see it as Pastor's fall victim to infidelity, suicide, and depression.  The losses can be devastating.  A ministry can die, people may question their salvation, others will leave the church forever.

But we must remember that Satan has been defeated!  He cannot win.  Victory is ours and the church must persevere!

Has you Pastoral team, Elders, or Deacons counted the cost of the ministry to the Pastoral leadership at your church?  Do you have a structure that will provide a hedge of protection, a place of accountability, where your Pastor can come to support him and provide strength for the ministry?  We must not bury our heads in the sand and abandon the Pastor by putting a Pastor on a pedestal and ignoring the spiritual warfare that is very real.  I would encourage your elder team, deacons, or leadership team to address this issue to ensure that your Pastor and your ministry can ward off the attacks of the evil one.

Pray for your Pastor Daily and create an environment that does not isolate your Pastor. If you and your leadership need guidance in addressing this in your church contact me today at johnm@thechurchconsultants.com.  We will work to help you set up a system that allows for accountability and connect you with others that may be able to assist you in a deeper way.